Legal Opinion

Bertha v. Sparks

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 8, 1898No. 2,310PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Robinson, C. J. -— Appellant appeals from a judgment

— Appellant appeals from a judgment rendered in appellee’s favor for brokerage commissions. . The errors assigned are that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial. It is said that the complaint does not state that a demand had been made before suit brought. A demand was not necessary. Where money is due a party on a contract, the suit constitutes a sufficient demand. Ferguson v. State, ex rel., 90 Ind. 38; School Town of Princeton v. Gebhart, 61 Ind.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. School Town of Princeton v. GebhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Ferguson v. State ex rel. HagansIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Olvey v. JacksonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Harris v. State ex rel. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. King v. DowneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Over v. DehneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. Gilmore v. WardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. Vandalia Railroad v. KelleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. RoachIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API