Legal Opinion
In re Ida Q.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 21, 2004PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (LaBuda, J.), entered May 27, 2003 in Sullivan County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 81, inter alia, denied respondent’s request for counsel fees.
Petitioners commenced this proceeding seeking to have a guardian appointed for their mother, Ida Q. Supreme Court ultimately appointed respondent, another son, as the guardian and, upon agreement of the parties, discontinued the proceeding shortly before the scheduled trial date. At that time, the parties also agreed that petitioners would submit an application for counsel…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Spa Realty Associates v. Springs AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Ricciuti v. LombardiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Cippitelli v. County of SchenectadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Rose Valley Joint Venture v. Apollo Plaza AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Pearson v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re Kurt T.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Adderley v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re Charles X.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re Lukia QQ.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re Annette B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008