Legal Opinion

Martin v. Hamersky

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 6, 1901No. 12,212PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from Sedgwick district court; D. M. Dale,. judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Pollock, J. :

Plaintiff, Stephen Martin, leased sixty acres of unbroken prairie land to defendant, Anton Hamersky, for a term of two years, commencing March 1, 1895, and ending March 1, 1897. The consideration expressed in the lease reads as follows :

“For the use of said premises for the.term mentioned, he hereby covenants and agrees to break and cultivate for the said two years the above-mentioned property. . . . It is further agreed by the parties to the within, lease that lessee shall pay all taxes on the above-described property for the years 1895,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ives v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Becker v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  2. Thomas v. DudreySupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  3. City of Plattsmouth v. New Hampshire Sav. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  4. Thomas v. DudreySupreme Court of Kansas · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API