Legal Opinion
Martin v. Hamersky
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided July 6, 1901No. 12,212PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Error from Sedgwick district court; D. M. Dale,. judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Pollock, J. :
Plaintiff, Stephen Martin, leased sixty acres of unbroken prairie land to defendant, Anton Hamersky, for a term of two years, commencing March 1, 1895, and ending March 1, 1897. The consideration expressed in the lease reads as follows :
“For the use of said premises for the.term mentioned, he hereby covenants and agrees to break and cultivate for the said two years the above-mentioned property. . . . It is further agreed by the parties to the within, lease that lessee shall pay all taxes on the above-described property for the years 1895,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ives v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by4 opinions
- Becker v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
- Thomas v. DudreySupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
- City of Plattsmouth v. New Hampshire Sav. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Thomas v. DudreySupreme Court of Kansas · 1972