Legal Opinion

Dynamics Corp. of America v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 18, 1989No. 549-84CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARGOLIS, Judge.

This contract case is before the court on defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment on Count III of the complaint, and plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment on Count III. After a careful review of the entire record, and after hearing oral argument, the court has determined that the Economic Price Adjustment *61clause in the contract requires the government to negotiate a price adjustment. This opinion does not address the question of damages as urged by the plaintiff. The contract only requires negotiations between the parties on an appropriate adjustment.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. WPC Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  2. Beta Systems, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  3. Chris Berg, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  4. Southern Construction Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  5. Salem Engineering & Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Neal & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  2. Nebco & Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  3. Bloomington Hospital v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  4. Merrick v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  5. Antero Resources Corp. v. South Jersey Resources GroupCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API