Legal Opinion

Delevan v. Delevan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 12, 2010Published

1Opinion of the Court

The appeal by the father must be dismissed on the ground that he is not aggrieved by the order appealed from (see CPLR 5511). The father obtained all of the relief he sought in his motion, which was, inter alia, to vacate an order of the same court dated August 30, 2007, terminating his visitation, and to reinstate the provisions of a prior order of visitation dated June 19, 2007, awarding him supervised visitation (see Parochial Bus Sys. v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 60 NY2d 539, 545 [1983]; Parimist Funding Corp. v Suffolk Vascular Assoc., PLLC, 62 AD3d 974, 975 [2009]; Ell v S.E.T.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Parochial Bus Systems, Inc. v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Ell v. S.E.T. Landscape Design, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Parimist Funding Corp. v. Suffolk Vascular Associates, PLLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API