Legal Opinion

Buhler v. Department of Agriculture & Markets

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was ñled June 21, 1938:

Fritz, J.

During 1936 and 1937 the plaintiff, Louis Buhler, Sr., was a retail milk dealer under licenses issued T>y the defendant, Department of Agriculture and Markets (hereinafter called the "department”). On November 24, 1937, a complaint was served on the plaintiff in which the department charged that,—

“2. Said Louis Buhler, Sr., has violated the provisions of General Order 56g7 of the Department of Agriculture and Markets, applicable in the Racine regulated milk market, by failing to pay producers for milk and-cream delivered to him by such…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chippewa Bridge Co. v. City of DurandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Wisconsin Labor Relations Board v. Fred Rueping Leather Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Tesch v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Farmer v. St. Croix Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  5. State ex rel. Finnegan v. Lincoln Dairy Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Transport Oil, Inc. v. CummingsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  2. City of Fond Du Lac v. Department of Natural ResourcesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Wolan v. FerberNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  4. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API