Legal Opinion

Stricklin v. Flavel

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 27, 2002No. 97-2161; A112786PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

Defendants appeal from an amended money judgment in favor of plaintiffs. The amended judgment was entered after a hearing on plaintiffs’ “Supplemental Motion to Enforce Settlement and Entry of Judgment” (the supplemental motion) at which defendants made no appearance. Defendants assert that they did not receive adequate notice of the hearing and that the trial court lacked authority to enter the amended judgment. We affirm.

In May 1998, plaintiffs obtained a default judgment against defendants in the amount of $158,498.42, including $100,000 in punitive damages. In October 1999, plaintiffs…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stevens v. ForenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. City of Canby v. RinkesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. Davis v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Mitchem v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. Mitchem v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Benavente v. ThayerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. Calaveras II, LLC v. Eastside Bend, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API