Petro v. Davis
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, P. J.
Action brought by plaintiff and respondent, Charles A. Petro, against defendant and appellant, James C. Davis, Director General of Railroads in charge of Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad, to recover the sum of $985 and interest, which amount plaintiff -claims he was damaged by reason of negligence of defendant in transporting 134 head of cattle of plaintiff from Edgemont, this state, to South Omaha, Neb. It is claimed by plaintiff that on account of defendant’s negligence in course of transportation and unreasonable delay in *605such transportation said cattle lost in weight 50 pounds each,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hardenburgh v. HardenburghSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Johnston v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- Tiller & Smith v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Jackson v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
- Payne v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1916