Legal Opinion

E & S INVESTMENT CORP. v. Richland Bowl, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 12, 1975No. 20034PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice:

This case involves the liability and measure of damages, if any, of the appellant Richland Bowl, the lessee, and United Bowling Centers, Inc., its guarantor, to respondent E & S Investment Company, the lessor. In 1961 the above mentioned parties entered into a twenty (20) year commercial lease of a large bowling center. Since that time the lease has been twice assigned to new tenants, each time with the consent of all parties. By the terms of the assignments the appellants remain liable in the event of default by the tenant. Under the second assignment Frank Wray & Association…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bruce v. BlalockSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  2. Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co. v. JoyceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  3. Freeman v. King Pontiac Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  4. Diamond Swimming Pool Co. v. BroomeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
  5. Robert E. Lee & Co. v. Commission of Public WorksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sloan v. City of ConwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  2. E & S INVESTMENT CORP. v. Richland Bowl, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API