Legal Opinion
Huston v. Procter & Gamble Paper Products Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 8, 2009No. 07-2799PublishedCited by 265 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, Circuit Judge.
This is a Title VII suit for sexual harassment and retaliation. Priscilla Huston appeals from a grant of summary judgment in favor of her former employer, Procter & Gamble Paper Products Corporation (P & G). Huston’s appeal hinges on whether two P & G employees qualify as “management level” so that their knowledge may be imputed to P & G for purposes of liability under Title VII. The United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania determined that the two employees were not management level and that P & G took prompt and adequate remedial…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Katz v. DoleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- Michael Weston v. Commonwealth of of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by265 opinions
- Vance v. Ball State Univ.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Mandel v. M & Q Packaging Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Margaret Tourtellotte v. Eli Lilly & CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Tribune Media Company v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- LaRochelle v. Wilmac Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
260 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.