Legal Opinion

Cayton v. Safelite Glass Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 16, 2009No. 0502541, 0503208; A134878PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (board), challenging the board’s determinations that (1) he is not entitled to multiple penalties under ORS 656.268(5)(d) for employer’s multiple refusals to close his claim and (2) he is not eligible for a separate penalty and/or attorney fees under ORS 656.262(ll)(a) and ORS 656.382(1) for refusal to close his claim. We reverse and remand for further consideration.

Between January 2005 and December 2005, claimant may have made as many as 11 requests to employer for closure 1 of his workers’ compensation claim pursuant to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. PiwowarOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Red Robin International v. DombroskyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cayton v. Safelite Glass Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. Cayton v. Safelite Glass Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. State ex rel. Atty. Gen. of Ohio v. State Line Agri, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Calvi v. Gallagher Bassett Services Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
  5. Dancingbear v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API