Legal Opinion
United States v. Uval Tubol, AKA Alon Yasar
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 19, 1999No. 1998PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POOLER, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Uval Tubol appeals his convictions for violating the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951, by robbing an appliance store; possession of a firearm; and bank robbery. A jury in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York convicted Tubol of (1) robbing the appliance store, (2) using a firearm in connection with the appliance store robbery, (3) robbing a bank, and (4) being an illegal alien in possession of a firearm. Tubol concedes his guilt on the last charge but argues that the jury lacked sufficient evidence to convict on both of the robbery…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United States v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Dennis Geaney and Vincent Russell LynchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Robert Maher, AKA "Bob M.", Peter Mancusi, Andrew GiordanoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Arthur MorrisonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- United States v. Gurmeet Singh DhinsaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Christian PaulinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Carlos GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Steven Madori, Charles ChiapettaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- United States v. SantosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.