Legal Opinion
Hogan v. Fleming
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided June 16, 1924PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.
This is an action for damages for personal injuries. At the close 'of all the testimony the jury in response to a. peremptory instruction returned a verdict for the defendants.. Plaintiff has appealed.
The evidence taken in its most favorable light to plaintiff shows that he was a police officer riding in the front seat of a police patrol automobile, driven by a police chauffeur by the name of Pyeatt, about noon of the 16th day of February, 1921. The patrol wagon had a large body mounted on. a Packard chassis. The body had printed on each side the words “Police Patrol.” It was equipped with a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Miller v. United Railways Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1911
- Vansickle v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
- Buckner v. Stock Yards Horse & Mule Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Farley v. . the Mayor, Etc.New York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Benton v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Frandeka v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- Hogan v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1929
- Hogan v. FlemingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
- Bartholomew v. Oregonian Publishing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Loomis v. AbelsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.