Legal Opinion

Lappas v. Barker

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided September 20, 1963PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLAY, Commissioner.

• This suit was instituted primarily for the purpose of selling an oil and gas leasehold to satisfy a $50,000 note executed by the principal appellant Lappas. Upon the assertion of other claims in the suit, an accounting was had. Appellants took the position that the whole transaction out of which this $50,000 note arose was fraudulent, and they sought to cancel the note, rescind various leases and recover for certain expenditures. The Chancellor found against them on all phases of the controversy.

Lappas, who may be described as a capitalist from New Jersey, had worked with…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jackson v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Wyoming-Indiana Oil & Gas Co. v. WestonWyoming Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Drew v. HobbsSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  4. Lowe v. HendrickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
  5. Fink v. WeismanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Steelvest, Inc. v. Scansteel Service Center, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Texas Bank and Trust Co. v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Jacked Up, L.L.C. v. Sara Lee CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  4. Henkin, Inc. v. Berea Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1978
  5. Dsg Corporation v. Frederick E. Anderson, Edward W. Mitura, and Hwa Ja MituraCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API