Legal Opinion
Smith v. Fair
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided August 8, 1973No. C 73-187PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
WALINSKI, District Judge.
This cause came to be heard on a petition for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
Petitioners Smith and Hatfield are the manager and projectionist, respectively, of a theatre in Lima, Ohio, which exhibits material of a sexually explicit nature. Smith was charged in an affidavit filed by Lawrence S. Huffman, Prosecuting Attorney of Allen County, Ohio, with exhibiting obscene material contrary to § 2905.35 of the Ohio Revised Code. That affidavit was filed May 8, 1973.
On that same date Gary R. Hermon, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, filed a…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smith v. FairCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. John Dohm and Robert RowenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. John Dohm and Robert RowenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979