Advance Rumely Thresher Co. v. West
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Montgomery district court; Joseph W. Holdren, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Porter, J.:
The Advance-Rumely Thresher Company sued defendant on two promissory notes. In his answer and cross-petition the defendant alleged that the notes were given for the price of a farm tractor purchased of the Rumely Products Company on October 20, 1914, under a written contract by which the tractor was warranted to do good work and that by reason of the failure of the warranty he had been damaged to the extent of over $1,200 for which he asked judgment against plaintiff. The answer denied that plaintiff was an innocent purchaser of the notes…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Elmo State Bank v. HildebrandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
3Cited by8 opinions
- International Harvester Co. of America v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
- Cotton v. John Deere Plow Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Burdg v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- First National Bank v. GreathouseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- Kansas State Bank v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.