Legal Opinion

Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Bynum

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 18, 1927PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Commissioner Hobson

Affirming.

The Fidelity & Casualty Company issued to appellee a policy, which, among other things, contained the following provision:

“The Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York (herein called the company) does hereby insure the person (herein called the assured) named in statement A. of the schedule of warranties against—
“ (1) Bodily injury sustained during the term of one year. . . .
“ (2) Illness, contracted hy the assured during the term of 350 days from noon, standard time, of the 15th day after the day that this policy is dated, and necessarily…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. National Life & Accident Insurance v. O'Brien'sCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  2. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. HartCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  3. Hagman v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Janney v. Scranton Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  3. Benefit Association of Ry. Employees v. SecrestCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  4. Sun Indemnity Co. v. DulaneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  5. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API