Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Luna

OPINION

SEERDEN, Justices.

The Supreme Court has remanded this case so that points previously raised by appellant relating to factual sufficiency of the evidence on certain matters may be determined. In addition, appellees have filed a motion for prejudgment interest. We affirm the trial court’s judgment and deny the motion for prejudgment interest.

A complete statement of the facts in this case is found in our original opinion. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Luna, 707 S.W.2d 113 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1985), rev’d. 724 S.W.2d 383 (Tex.1987).

Southern Pacific urges by its ninth point of…