Legal Opinion
Ann S. Nunnally v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided June 12, 1961No. 18729PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal from a Mann Act conviction asserts directly two things. First, there was either insufficient evidence to show transportation by the specified common carrier, or at least there was a fatal variance between the allegation and proof. And second, there was insufficient evidence to show that the purpose of transportation was to engage in prostitution on arrival at destination. We reject these contentions and affirm.
Unlike the usual Mann Act case where conviction is based on either the act of transportation or the procurement of transportation of a person…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Hoke & Economides v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Mortensen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Thomas Curtis Bush v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Roark v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Lloyd M. Pelton, United States of America v. Jacqueline RichCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Thong Vang and Neng VueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Eli JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Leonard L. Bursten, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Kenneth SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.