Legal Opinion
López-Santos v. Metro. Sec. Servs., Inc.
United States District Court
Decided June 14, 2018No. Civil No. 16–2071(FAB)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
BESOSA, District Judge.
Before the Court are defendant Metropolitan Security Services, Inc. d/b/a Walden Security ("Walden")'s and plaintiffs Rafael López-Santos ("López") and Erasmo Domena-Ríos ("Domena") (collectively, "plaintiffs")'s cross-motions for summary judgment filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 (" Rule 56"). (Docket Nos. 36 & 41.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Walden's motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 36.) Accordingly, plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 41) is rendered moot.
I. Background
The following facts are deemed…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Maldonado-Denis v. Castillo-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Santiago-Ramos v. Centennial P.R. Wireless Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Cabán Hernández v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Adria International Group, Inc. v. Ferré Development, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lopez-Santos v. Metropolitan Security ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020