Legal Opinion

Pardee v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1932Published

1Opinion of the CourtLarkin, J.

This action is brought to recover upon two policies of life insurance issued by the defendant upon the life of the late Jesse Homan Pardee. The policies were payable to his estate. His will has been probated. The executors therein named are his wife, Mary McClung Pardee, and the M & T Trust Company. Together they constitute the party plaintiff in this action. The answer admits the issuance of the policies, and pleads, as an affirmative defense, that they are void because the insured committed suicide. Concededly, the burden of proof is upon defendant to establish this defense. It has given…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Parkhurst v. . BerdellNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. People v. . TruckNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. McGuffin v. DinsmoreThe Superior Court of New York City · 1878
  4. Heit & Weisenthal, Inc. v. Gustave LightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  5. Millspaugh v. PotterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API