Rodriguez v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLINTON, Judge.
Appellant Rodriguez appeals his conviction for possession of a prohibited weapon. Appellants Turner, Bousley, King and Ca-vanaugh appeal convictions for possession of marihuana. The punishment assessed in each case was three days confinement and a fine of $150.00.
Each appellant raises a single ground of error which complains of the trial court’s failure to grant their motions to suppress which alleged that the marihuana admitted into evidence was obtained in a warrantless search. 1
The evidence adduced on the motions to suppress established appellant Carolyn Bousley…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Galitz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Bower v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Joseph v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
- Cornealius v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Bouyer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2008
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.