Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided July 6, 1983No. 66816-66820PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CLINTON, Judge.

Appellant Rodriguez appeals his conviction for possession of a prohibited weapon. Appellants Turner, Bousley, King and Ca-vanaugh appeal convictions for possession of marihuana. The punishment assessed in each case was three days confinement and a fine of $150.00.

Each appellant raises a single ground of error which complains of the trial court’s failure to grant their motions to suppress which alleged that the marihuana admitted into evidence was obtained in a warrantless search. 1

The evidence adduced on the motions to suppress established appellant Carolyn Bousley…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Galitz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Bower v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  2. Joseph v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
  3. Cornealius v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  4. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  5. Bouyer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2008

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API