Legal Opinion

Tompkins v. Holman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 28, 1976No. 12399PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Chief Justice.

The principal question in this case is whether the trial court was correct in granting appellees’ motion for summary judgment based on appellees’ plea of res judicata.

Appellants1 brought this suit against Juanita Swick Holman and her husband, Brooks Holman, seeking to set aside a deed to certain land in Harris County, title to which had been in Etta Tompkins now deceased. Etta Tompkins was the mother of the appellants and the grandmother of ap-pellee Juanita Swick Holman, Brooks Holman, who became the executor of Etta Tompkins’ estate at her death, subsequently…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Slaughter v. QuallsTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. MacDonald v. FollettTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Carl v. SettegastTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  4. McCampbell v. DurstCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  5. Texas Creosoting Co. v. Hartburg Lumber Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Interfirst Bank-Houston, N.A. v. Quintana Petroleum Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985
  2. Gibraltar Savings Ass'n v. Martin, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1990
  3. Happy Jack Ranch, Inc. and Frederick J. Behrend v. HH&L Development, Inc. Matthew Stolhandske, Trustee Michael Strnad, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API