United Western Minerals Company v. Hannsen
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Moore.
We will refer to plaintiff in error as United and to defendants in error as plaintiffs, as they appeared in the trial court. Since there is but one controlling question involved in this review, we limit consideration to those portions of the record which bear directly upon that issue.
Plaintiffs, as lessors, entered into a written contract with United, as lessee, under which sixteen unpatented lode mining claims were leased for a period of two years ending December 21, 1958. The annual rental which United agreed to pay was $3,200.00. In the complaint it is alleged…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Cole v. RalphSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Gwillim v. DonnellanSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Union Oil Co. of Cal. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Weed v. SnookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Davis v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Davis v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Geomet Exploration, Ltd. v. Lucky Mc Uranium Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979