Legal Opinion

H.M. v. E.T.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 4, 2010PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Ciparick, J.

This appeal presents the issue whether Family Court has subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate a support petition brought pursuant to the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA) (Family Ct Act art 5-B) by a biological parent seeking child support from her former same-sex partner. We hold that Family Court possesses subject matter jurisdiction to hear such a petition.

H.M. seeks child support from E.T. According to H.M.’s allegations, which we must take as true for present purposes, the parties were involved in a romantic relationship in New York *525from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Loomis v. LoomisNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. Johna Ms v. Russell EsNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Higgins v. . SharpNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. MATTER OF SPENCER v. SpencerNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. H.M. v. E.T.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Meyer v. SeidelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
  2. Lisa T. v. King E. T.Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 2017
  3. In re Adoption of Jaelyn B.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Matter Hm v. EtNew York Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API