H.M. v. E.T.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Ciparick, J.
This appeal presents the issue whether Family Court has subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate a support petition brought pursuant to the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA) (Family Ct Act art 5-B) by a biological parent seeking child support from her former same-sex partner. We hold that Family Court possesses subject matter jurisdiction to hear such a petition.
H.M. seeks child support from E.T. According to H.M.’s allegations, which we must take as true for present purposes, the parties were involved in a romantic relationship in New York *525from…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Loomis v. LoomisNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Johna Ms v. Russell EsNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- Higgins v. . SharpNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- MATTER OF SPENCER v. SpencerNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- H.M. v. E.T.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
3Cited by4 opinions
- Meyer v. SeidelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
- Lisa T. v. King E. T.Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 2017
- In re Adoption of Jaelyn B.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2016
- Matter Hm v. EtNew York Court of Appeals · 2010