Legal Opinion

Matter Hm v. Et

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 4, 2010No. 48PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

14 N.Y.3d 521 (2010)

930 N.E.2d 206

904 N.Y.S.2d 285

In the Matter of H.M., Appellant,

v.

E.T., Respondent.

No. 48

Court of Appeals of New York.

Argued February 17, 2010.

Decided May 4, 2010.

Proskauer Rose LLP, New York City (Peter J.W. Sherwin, Kenneth E. Aldous, Justin F. Heinrich and Nicole Haff of counsel), for appellant.

Nixon Peabody LLP, Rochester (David H. Tennant and Erik A. Goergen of counsel), for respondent.

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, New York City (Matthew L. Craner, Lisa M. Cirando and Scott Roehm of counsel), for New York County Lawyers' Association, amicus curiae.

Carmelyn P.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Michael H. v. Gerald D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Brescia v. FittsNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. In Re the Estate of FindlayNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. MTR. OF SHONDEL J. v. Mark D.New York Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Matter of JacobNew York Court of Appeals · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lisa T. v. King E. T.Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 2017
  2. In re Adoption of Jaelyn B.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API