Legal Opinion · Dissent

Strong v. Strong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1930Published

1Dissent

Sherman, J. (dissenting).

I do not concur in the decision about to be made. The application of the rule forbidding a plaintiff to split his cause of action and maintain successive suits results here in depriving plaintiff of the right to recover upon non-negotiable notes indorsed by defendant and given as part of the purchase price of property formerly owned by the partnership composed of the parties to this action. The purpose of the delivery of the notes was to enable plaintiff to sue upon them and not be compelled to plead the agreement of partnership settlement, out of which the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Secor v. . SturgisNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Banzer v. RichterNew York Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Klipstein v. Wolfson Holding Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API