Smith v. Concannon
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
In 1981, Congress enacted the “lump sum” rule that rendered recipients of Aid to Families with Dependent Children (“AFDC”) ineligible for AFDC benefits for a period of time after they receive a lump sum of money from outside sources. 42 U.S.C. § 602(a)(17). This appeal challenges Oregon’s application of that lump-sum rule to its Medicaid program.
Brenda Smith and her children were receiving AFDC benefits in May of 1989. During that month, Smith received a check for her daughter’s retroactive Social Security benefits in the amount of $3,285. Under the AFDC lump-sum rule,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Batterton v. FrancisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Schweiker v. Gray PanthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Gardebring v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Herweg v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Olson v. NormanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Smith v. ConcannonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991