Legal Opinion

In Re Marriott

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided July 29, 1993No. 17-31763PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KENNETH J. MEYERS, Bankruptcy Judge.

The Chapter 12 standing trustee and the United States Trustee have filed objections to confirmation of the debtors’ Chapter 12 plan because it fails to provide for payment of the standing trustee’s fee set pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 586(e)(1)(B). The plan of debtors, Carl and Jane Marriott, provides for all plan payments to be made through the Chapter 12 trustee and further provides for payment of trustee fees in the amount of $1,500 per year. The standing trustee, Bob Kearney, and the United States Trustee assert that the debtors’ plan must provide for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re CitrowskeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1987
  2. In Re SavageDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1986
  3. In Re SousaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island · 1985
  4. In Re MelitaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. In Re MyersUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re AcevedoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
  2. In Re TurnerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1994
  3. Westpfahl v. Clark (In Re Westpfahl)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 1994
  4. In Re MarriottUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API