Legal Opinion

Peck v. Dill

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 11, 1991No. 89-86, 89-87PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

581 So.2d 800 (1991)

Harold G. PECK and John O. Morrow, Jr., d/b/a Peck and Morrow, Attorneys at Law

v.

Danny B. DILL, as father and conservator of Mandy Dill, a minor.

The PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA

v.

Danny B. DILL, as father and conservator of Mandy Dill, a minor.

89-86, 89-87.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

January 11, 1991.

Rehearing Denied April 5, 1991.

John O. Morrow, Jr., Florence, for appellants Peck and Morrow.

J. Mark Hart and Pamela F. Colbert of Spain, Gillon, Grooms, Blan & Nettles, Birmingham, for appellant The Prudential Ins. Co. of America.

William M. Bouldin of Guin, Bouldin &…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Peebles v. MileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Powell v. Blue Cross and Blue ShieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Maryland Cas. Co. v. TiffinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. HayesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  5. Doyle v. GiuliucciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ex Parte State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. Complete Health, Inc. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  3. Alfa Mut. Ins. Co. v. HeadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  4. Ex Parte BrockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  5. J.T. Ex Rel. Thode v. Monster Mountain, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API