Legal Opinion

Harmon v. Harrison

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 17, 1941No. 4-6209PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Appellee sued to recover $3,000 damages alleged to have resulted when coming in contact with wet concrete, while employed by appellant.

The averments of specific acts of negligence in ap-pellee’s complaint are that (1) appellant was negligent in failing to warn appellee who was inexperienced in such matters of the danger of cement burns; (2) in failing to provide the appellee with safe and suitable coverings for his feet and legs to protect them from injury from cement and concrete burns; and (3) in furnishing unsanitary rubber boots and requiring appellee to wear them, when the boots were…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  2. Hot Springs Railroad v. McMillanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  3. Kurn v. FaubusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  4. C. H. Atkinson Paving Co. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Edgar Hutcheson and Lena Hutcheson v. Frito-Lay, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  2. Fitzwater v. Lambert and Barr, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1982
  3. Lynch v. Missouri-Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  4. Edgar Hutcheson and Lena Hutcheson v. Frito-Lay, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  5. Ozan Lumber Company v. BishopSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API