Ozan Lumber Company v. Bishop

If it were conceded that the verdict is grossly excessive and, for that reason, should be reduced, yet that is not what the majority do. The judgment is not reduced; the cause of action has been dismissed.

It is' undisputed that .appellee received an injury for which he should have compensation, if appellant is liable for that injury. Indeed, the majority opinion concedes that the testimony is sufficient to support the finding that the injury is permanent, although it is stated that such a finding would be clearly against the preponderance of the evidence. Needless to say, that is .a question…