Legal Opinion

State v. Thurman

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 13, 1991No. CR 91-93PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

The jury found the appellees guilty of a misdemeanor. They moved for judgments notwithstanding the verdicts. The State objected and, among other things, contended that such judgments are not authorized by the Rules, of Criminal Procedure. See A.R.Cr.P. Rule 36.22. The trial court granted the judgments notwithstanding the verdicts. The State attempts to appeal the decision for the future guidance of trial courts. See A.R.Cr.P. Rule 36.10. We dismiss the appeal because the transcript was not filed within the sixty (60) day period as required by A.R.Cr.P. Rule 36.10(c),…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. BlandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. White v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  2. Perry v. NorrisDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1995
  3. State v. ThurmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API