Legal Opinion
Lochridge v. City of Tacoma
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided December 8, 2014No. CASE NO. C14-5053 RJBPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT
ROBERT J. BRYAN, United States District Judge
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion to Amend Complaint. Dkt. 31. The Court has considered the pleadings in support of and in opposition to the motion and the record herein.
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
On October 29, 2012, Plaintiff Lochridge filed a complaint with OSHA alleging a violation of the Federal Rail Safety Act (FRSA), 49 U.S.C. § 20109. The complaint provides in its entirety as follows:
Complainant claims that on or about June 23, 2012, he was brought up on charges and on…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Marilyn Miller v. Rykoff-Sexton, Inc., and Atlas Hotels, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Lockheed Martin Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Network Solutions, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- International Mezzo Technologies Inc v. Airborne ECS LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
- King County v. Viracon IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
- NXP USA Inc v. Impinj IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022
- OneAZ Credit Union v. Southwest Heritage Bank, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2026
- Palpallatoc v. The Boeing CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.