NXP USA Inc v. Impinj Inc
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 NXP USA, INC., and NXP B.V., CASE NO. 2:20-cv-01503-JHC 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER 9 v. 10 IMPINJ, INC., 11 Defendant. 12 13 14 This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Impinj’s Motion for Leave to File 15 Amended Answer. Dkt. # 179. Defendant previously sought leave to amend its complaint, on 16 December 3, 2020, to add counterclaims concerning eight patents. Dkt. # 63. The Court denied 17 the motion, finding the proposed amendment would be prejudicial. Dkt # 79 (magistrate judge’s 18 ruling); Dkt. # 110…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Christopher Owens Cynthia Hutchins,plaintiffs-Appellants v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan,inc., a California Corporation,defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant/appellant v. Frank Rose Clive "Sonny" Miller, Defendants-Counter-Plaintiffs/appelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Danica Brown v. Stored Value Cards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Wizards of the Coast LLC v. Cryptozoic Entertainment LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2015
- Deakyne v. Commissioners of LewesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.