Legal Opinion

Van Heest v. McNeilab, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided December 18, 1985No. Civ. A. 83-336 MMSPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff Jeanne M. Van Heest brought this sex-discrimination action against de fendant McNeilab, Inc., trading as First State Chemical Co., Inc. (“McNeilab”), to recover back wages and other damages. Plaintiff’s claims are based on the Equal Pay Act of 1963, 29 U.S.C. § 206(d) & § 206 note, and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. In essence, plaintiff claims that during the period from August 22, 1980, to October 31, 1982, when she worked for McNeilab, defendant discriminated against her on the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  4. Croker v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  5. Louise L. Jenkins v. The Home Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Carr v. Town of Dewey BeachDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1990
  2. Parker v. BurnleyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1988
  3. United States v. Complex MacHine Works Co.United States Court of International Trade · 1996
  4. Berry v. EI Dupont De Nemours and Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1985
  5. Grigoletti v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API