State v. Hogie
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MESCHKE, Justice.
We consider consolidated appeals by Robert W. Hogie, Jr., from a jury conviction for theft of property and from a following order which revoked his probation on a prior conviction. We hold that Ho-gie’s possession of the recently stolen automobile sufficiently corroborated testimony of two accomplices for the theft conviction. We affirm both the conviction and the revocation.
Hogie was criminally charged with theft of an automobile, a class C felony under NDCC 12.1-23-02(1) and 12.1-23-05(2)(d). During his jury trial, the State used the testimony of two accomplices who had…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Barnes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. KentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
- State v. LindNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. HaugenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. ZimmermanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. GaedeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. AustinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. CarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. TorresNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.