Legal Opinion

Doe v. Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided March 17, 1995No. 1:94 CV 5006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND

SCHELL, Chief Judge.

Before this court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Ruling on Magistrate’s Recommendation for Remand, filed on February 1, 1995. Defendants American Home Products Corporation and Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories’ response was timely filed on February 23, 1995. A reply thereto was filed on March 6,1995, and a surreply was filed on March 9,1995. Upon consideration of the motion, responses, and attached exhibits, the court is of the opinion that the motion should be GRANTED.

BACKGROUND

The Plaintiffs originally filed this suit…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. In Re KOREAN AIR LINES DISASTER OF SEPTEMBER 1, 1983. Appeal of Plaintiffs Steering CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  3. Chan v. Korean Air Lines, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. David C. Wilson v. Intercollegiate (Big Ten) Conference Athletic Association, an Unincorporated AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  5. Fletcher v. HamletSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bueno v. Wyeth-Ayerst LaboratoriesDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1996
  2. In Re Norplant Contraceptive Prod. Liability Litig.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API