Legal Opinion
Duke v. Langdon
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 4, 1983No. 81-4588PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge:
Appellant, Charla Duke, is a former junior attorney with the IRS. Her appointment to this position was conditional, there being a one year probationary period. She commenced employment on .or about October 20, 1980.
Her performance evaluation in June, 1981 contained a recommendation against retention. She was again evaluated in August, 1981, and, again, she was not recommended for retention. Approximately four months later, she was terminated since her performance had not improved.
In late September, 1981, Duke filed a formal employment discrimination complaint with the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- 21 Fair empl.prac.cas. 990, 22 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 30,594 Ina P. Anderson v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Ruby O. PORTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Brock ADAMS Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Berg v. Richmond Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Richmond Unified School District v. BergSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- McGinnis v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1980
3Cited by7 opinions
- Remlinger v. State of Nev.District Court, D. Nevada · 1995
- Ogunleye v. ArizonaDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1999
- Jacobsen v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1986
- 30 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1059, 30 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,273 Charla Duke v. Emory Langdon, as Regional Counsel, Western Region, Office of the Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service, Department of the Treasury, United States of America, James Booher, Lamont Olsen, John E. Lahart, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Jeanie Lombard, et al. v. Matanuska-Susitna Borough School District, et al.District Court, D. Alaska · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.