Legal Opinion
Berg v. Richmond Unified School District
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 9, 1975No. 74-1457PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before MERRILL and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges, and SMITH, * District Judge. KOELSCH, Circuit Judge:
When plaintiff Berg, a school teacher employed by defendant Richmond Unified School District, became pregnant, the defendants — the School District and its officers — acting pursuant to a district policy relating solely to pregnant employees,1 threatened to (1) require her to *1210cease working on a date earlier than she and her physician believed necessary and (2) deny her the benefit of accumulated sick leave pay while she was not working. Thereafter, in the fifth month of her pregnancy,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleurSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Dr. Joy HOCHSTADT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WORCESTER FOUNDATION FOR EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- Gooding v. Warner-Lambert Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Wrighten v. Metropolitan Hospitals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Hochstadt v. Worcester Foundation for Experimental Biology, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1976
- Barbara S. Clanton v. Orleans Parish School BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.