Legal Opinion
Dinsmore v. Squadron, Ellenoff, Plesent, Sheinfeld & Sorkin
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 28, 1998No. 202, Docket 97-7011PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge.
This interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) presents the question whether the Supreme Court’s decision in Central Bank, N.A. v. First Interstate Bank, N.A, 511 U.S. 164, 114 S.Ct. 1439, 128 L.Ed.2d 119 (1994), holding that there is no aiding and abetting cause of action in private civil suits brought under § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“§ 10(b)”)1 and Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5 (“Rule lobs’’),2 also precludes a cause of action for conspiracy. We hold that it does.
I
Because the district court decided the question…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- In Re Global Crossing, Ltd. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Regents of the University of California v. Credit Suisse First Boston (USA), Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- In Re Parmalat Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & ERISA Lit.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2002
- In Re Currency Conversion Fee Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.