Legal Opinion

Appeal of Manchester Transit Authority

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 1, 2001No. 98-730PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, J.,

retired, specially assigned under RSA 490:3. The petitioner, Manchester Transit Authority (MTA), appeals a decision of the appellate board of the New Hampshire Department of Employment Security (appellate board) finding the respondent school bus drivers (claimants) eligible for unemployment benefits for the week ending February 28, 1998. We reverse.

The following facts were either found by the New Hampshire Department of Employment Security Appeal Tribunal (appeal tribunal) and are not challenged here, or appear on the record before us. MTA is a public authority incorporated by the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In re Alfred P.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  2. State v. HermsdorfSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  3. Snyder v. New Hampshire Savings BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  4. Appeal of Work-a-Day of Nashua, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  5. Appeal of RouthierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. WhitteySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  2. In re R.A.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  3. In Re RupaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  4. Appeal of WingateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  5. Monica Anderson v. Estate of Mary D. WoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API