Legal Opinion

Christine Hernandez v. DiaSorin Inc., Michael Profenno, Nineveh Sarggis, Dustin Stewart, Matt Salisbury, John and Jane Does 1-10, and ABC Entities 1-10

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 22, 2025No. 1:25-cv-00846Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CHRISTINE HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, -against- No. 25-CV-00846 (LAP) DIASORIN INC., MICHAEL PROFENNO, OPINION AND ORDER NINEVEH SARGGIS, DUSTIN STEWART, MATT SALISBURY, JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10, AND ABC ENTITIES 1- 10, Defendants. LORETTA A. PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge: Before the Court are Nineveh Sarggis (“Sarggis”), DiaSorin Inc. (“DiaSorin”), Michael Profenno (“Profenno”), Dustin Stewart (“Stewart”), and Matt Salisbury’s (“Salisbury”) (collectively, “Defendants”) motions for dismissal1 and partial dismissal2 of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Littlejohn v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  4. Salahuddin v. CuomoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  5. Koch v. Christie's International PLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API