Legal Opinion

Gaither v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 31, 1928No. 7 Div. 357PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

As a predicate for the introduction of the testimony of one Ola Strong, a witness, who had testified in behalf of the state when this defendant was on trial for the offense here charged in the county court of Clay county, the. state offered Howard Strong, who testified that he had not heard from the said Ola lately, i. e., for four or five weeks, but that six or seven weeks before trial he had received a letter from Ola, at which.time she was in Detroit, Mich. Without other proof as to the whereabouts of Ola Strong, the state, over objection and exception, was allowed to make proof of her…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
  2. Hines v. MiniardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  3. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  4. State Bank v. SeawellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
  5. Wigginton v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Coleman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  2. Burrow v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API