Hines v. Miniard
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The first appeal, decided June 30, 1920, was on the issue of wanton misconduct of Conductor Wakefield after plaintiff had complained to that official to prevent a continuation of abqse and insult. Hines v. Miniard, 204 Ala. 514, 86 South. 23, 12 A. L. R. 238. The gravamen of count A, on which the second trial rested, was that the injury plaintiff suffered was proximately caused by the gross and wanton negligence of the defendant’s servants, acting within the line and scope of their employment in and about the carriage of plaintiff as a passenger.
Defendant requested general affirmative charges…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. AultSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Morris v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- Jones v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Burton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Clark v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Louisville N. R. Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Woodard v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Beaird v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Catts v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.