Legal Opinion · Dissent

Losee v. Hettich

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1952No. File 9252Published

1DissentRoberts, J.

I cannot agree with the majority opinion holding that taxpayers may not enjoin payment under an illegal or unauthorized contract if the court finds that the indebtedness is just and equitable and the parties acted in good faith.

It .is well settled that taxpayers are entitled to maintain a suit to enjoin illegal action by public officers. Graves v. Jasper School Township; 2 S. D. 414, 50 N.W. 904; Weatherer v. Herron, 25 S. D. 208, 126 N.W. 244; Hoekman v. Iowa Civil Township, 28 S. D. 206, 132 N.W. 1004. Whether a contract for public work is to be entered into through private negotiations or…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bartron v. Codington CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Bechthold v. City of WauwatosaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Farmer v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  4. Wood v. BangsSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1875
  5. Seim v. Independent District of MonroeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API