Legal Opinion

Canada v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 25, 1840PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Indictment. From the Circuit Court for Hickman County.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chief Justice

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

In England, a person prosecuted by information or indictment, for a fine for a misdemeanor, might be convicted without his personal appearance. Toptcliff vs Waller, Dyer 346, b. 1 Chitty’s Crim. law, 411-12, marg. pa.

This doctrine is not changed here by the second section of the act of 1805, (1 Stat. Law, 534,) which requires a capias to be issued, unless the accused shall appear in obedience to a venire facias, whereby he had been warned to appear. That requisition was only intended to afford to the Commonwealth, security for satisfaction…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Steele v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1835

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. CampbellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. People v. BuddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Woods v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1840

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API