Legal Opinion

Steele v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 26, 1835PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Indictment. From the Circuit Court for Fayette County.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Robertson

Judge Ewing taking no part in the decision, as he was not present at the hearing.

Hiram Steele, who was recognised to answer an indictment for unlawfully setting up and keeping a gaming table, having ; failed to appear, his recognisance was, at the instance of his surety, respited; and a jury, sworn “to try the case” having returned a verdict of “guilty,” the Court rendered a judgment for five hundred dollars penalty.

This appeal, prosecuted to reverse that judgment, presents three questions: first — was it proper to “try the case” in the appellant’s absence? second — did the Circuit Judge err…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re BairdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. People v. BuddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Canada v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1840

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API