Legal Opinion

State v. Berge

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1981No. 5244PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Justice.

Defendant, David Berge, was convicted by a jury of transportation and possession of marijuana in violation of A.R.S. §§ 36-1002.07 and 36-1002.05. The sentences were suspended and he was placed on probation for concurrent terms of five years for transportation and two years for possession. He now appeals the convictions and sentences. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 47(e)(5), Rules of the Supreme Court, 17A A.R.S.

We must consider only one issue on appeal and that is: Was the search of the defendant’s residence conducted pursuant to a valid search warrant?

The facts…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. State v. BojorquezArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  5. State v. CoxArizona Supreme Court · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsonArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. SummerlinArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Mehrens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  4. State v. CrowleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  5. McNeill v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API