Legal Opinion

Committee for Consideration of Jones Falls Sewage System v. Train

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided May 13, 1974No. Civ. 73-1188-YPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOSEPH H. YOUNG, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, two individuals who reside in the vicinity of the Jones Falls stream and several citizens associations from nearby communities, seek injunctive relief restraining defendants from granting permits for sewer hook-ups into the Jones Falls sewer system and requiring them to revoke certain existing hook-up permits in cases where the connection has not yet been made. An order is also requested which would compel Russell E. Train, as the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (E.P.A.) to perform allegedly non-diseretionary…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Illinois v. City of MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Georgia v. Tennesssee Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Missouri v. Illinois & the Sanitary DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Missouri v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. North Dakota v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Connecticut v. American Elec. Power Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  2. Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. United States Veterans AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  4. Parsell v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1976
  5. United States v. Gaf CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API